Tuesday, October 6, 2020

The Downside of...

 

Ownership

“Everything we invite into our lives requires a certain measure of time and attention—usually more than we think when we acquire it. So our days, especially our time ‘off,’ our evenings and weekends, end up being dedicated to keeping all our possessions in working order. The invitation to poverty is not an invitation to suffer deprivation, but rather to consider whether the things we have acquired are really serving us—or are we serving them?”

Wayne Muller (Sabbath: Restoring the Sacred Rhythm of Rest, p.205)

          I have friends who own all the technological bells and whistles—phone, tablet, speaker, watch, smart tv—and on and on. I understand that all those things are cool when you get them and they are fun to direct and have respond to your voice, but they also have a downside. They track everything you do. I don’t know about you, but that creeps me out. It’s almost like having a stalker. Just this week, I was in a Target store, looking at long-sleeved shirts for winter, and minding my own business. By that evening, I was receiving ads for casual clothing on my computer. Creepy, right?

          What I have also noticed is that all that technology owned by friends is always in need of repair or recalibrating. Geek Squads are kept on speed dial. Also, the newest model comes out yearly, and to stay current with apps and updates, you need the new one. I understand that this is how capitalism works, but I do not like it. The last dishwasher I owned lasted fourteen years. The newer one, with all the computerized bells and whistles, is three years old and has already cost me almost $400.00 in repairs—and now it’s broken again. This is the sort of thing that causes us “old geezers” to yearn for the good old days.

          Part of my desire to simplify life includes not being slave to my technology. A year ago, I took a $2,000.00 sewing machine back to the place I bought it and traded it in for a $300.00 dollar one that just sews a basic stitch and a few zigzag ones. The fancy one was simply too complicated. I had to spend an inordinate amount of time just figuring out how to operate the machine instead of working on the project at hand. Any artist will tell you they do not like to be interrupted in the middle of a creative streak just because something malfunctions. It puts us in a monstrous mood to say the least. Perhaps you have experienced that yourself.

          We can look at doing without in two ways; we can see it as deprivation, and will therefore suffer, or we can view it as freedom from the constraints of ownership. Perception is everything. Mother Teresa and her Little Sister of Mercy made poverty part of their vows. They chose to have little material comfort so they could focus on giving everything to the sick and dying. Our possessions distract us. Believe me, I am no Mother Teresa, and my choosing to live a simple life is purely self-serving—I simply do not want to spend my time taking care of things that don’t interest me. Whatever you choose in the way of ownership is up to you. Here is a question posed by Wayne Muller at the end of his chapter on the subject: “How much can we hold, how much can we take in, and still have room to bestow our full-hearted blessing.” It is a good question, don’t you think?

                                                  In the Spirit,

                                                  Jane

No comments: