Friday, January 24, 2020

Tell the Truth


What's Truth?

The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.”
Flannery O'Connor

As you may know, there's a trial going on in the US Senate to decide whether our impeached President shall be removed from office. Admittedly, I find it almost impossible to believe that thirty percent of American's still think the President is wonderful and has done nothing wrong. Watching as the House Managers lay out the case for removal from office, it seems crystal clear to me that Trump abused his power, and then stonewalled Congress when they lawfully tried to investigate what transpired between him and his liaisons and the new President of Ukraine. The manner in which the case has been documented in a clear and concise, step-by-step fashion has made it evident that there were underground operations with Giuliani and his associates. Sometimes, the president's own words make it obvious; transparent even. It's curious that people can watch the same thing and come away with completely different interpretations of what happened.

Watching this unfold, it seems clear that “truth” is what we believe it to be, or more likely, what we want it to be. In other words, it is subjective rather than objective. Oh, yes, the time-line of events and conversations are recorded and therefore objective; you can hear them for yourself. And trustworthy people have come forward and expressed what they saw and heard. But truth seems to lurk in the gaps between the words. Facts are not enough. Truth for each of us is based upon preconceived ideas of what the actions and words mean. My interpretation may be the absolute opposite of yours.

I am watching the impeachment trial because this is an historic moment, and because this sort of thing intrigues me. Also, because I believe our democracy hangs in the balance, not to mention our environment. However, with each of the one-hundred Senators having a different “truth,” the verdict clearly won't be based upon the facts of the President's behavior. It looks as though the decision will have little to do with the details of the case, and more to do with the emotions of our representatives—a truth that is pretty hard to stomach.

                                                                  In the Spirit,
                                                                     Jane

No comments: